Troubled program
An initiative has overrun, stalled, or quietly stopped delivering, and nobody inside can give a straight account of why.
Special Situations
Rapid senior assessment when leadership needs a clear position quickly, and needs it from someone with no stake in how the situation got here.
Situations
An initiative has overrun, stalled, or quietly stopped delivering, and nobody inside can give a straight account of why.
Directors have lost confidence in an AI position and want an assessment that does not come through management.
A platform or partner has not delivered, and the organization has to decide between remediation, replacement, and dispute.
A decision involving AI has been challenged publicly and the response has to be both accurate and defensible.
An agency has asked something the organization cannot yet answer with confidence.
Shareholders or a sponsor are questioning whether the AI thesis behind the plan still holds.
An automation or staffing decision has become contested inside the organization or in public.
A major customer or partner is questioning how AI is being used in work that affects them.
The organization is considering stopping, reversing, or substantially rewriting an AI commitment it has already made.
How this differs
Work begins within days. The first read on what is defensible arrives while options are still open.
Findings go to whoever retained us and no further. Nothing is published, referenced, or used as marketing.
We did not build the program, sell the platform, or write the plan. The assessment is not protecting anyone's earlier decision.
Dr. Jeffrey Allan does the interviews and forms the judgment. Urgent matters are not delegated.
What you get